synseer
01-26-2010, 11:57 AM
Phyllis Schlafly shares a different perspective on why Brown won the Mass. election against Coakley. Recalling historical accounts of Coakley, she contends that Coakley's feminist mindset had become too much of an unacceptable factor for many of the voters.
"It's no wonder that non-college-educated men voted overwhelmingly for Brown against Coakley by a massive 27-point margin. The Democrats are lucky enough to elect some feminists, but feminists are just too unappealing when running against a masculine man such as Brown."
http://townhall.com/columnists/PhyllisSchlafly/2010/01/26/the_real_loser_in_the_massachusetts_election
"It's no wonder that non-college-educated men voted overwhelmingly for Brown against Coakley by a massive 27-point margin. The Democrats are lucky enough to elect some feminists, but feminists are just too unappealing when running against a masculine man such as Brown."
http://townhall.com/columnists/PhyllisSchlafly/2010/01/26/the_real_loser_in_the_massachusetts_election