PDA

View Full Version : Pyongyang bluffs, seems to want war


nelson
07-03-2006, 08:21 PM
North Korea Vows 'Annihilating' Nuclear Strike if United States Attacks Pre-Emptively
FOX News, Monday, July 3, 2006
http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,201956,00.html

WASHINGTON — North Korea vowed on Monday to respond with an "annihilating" nuclear strike if it is attacked pre-emptively by the United States.

The Bush administration responded sternly, saying while it had no intention of attacking, it was determined to protect the United States if North Korea launched a long-range missile.

"Should North Korea take the provocative action of launching a missile the U.S. would respond appropriately, including by taking the necessary measures to protect ourselves," Julie Reside, a State Department spokeswoman, said.

Still, Reside said, the United States and other countries that have negotiated with North Korea are seeking a fundamentally different relationship with the reclusive regime. She said that relationship must be based on the complete and verifiable elimination of North Korea's nuclear weapons and nuclear program.

"We and our partners in the six-party process continue strongly to urge North Korea not to launch a long-range missile and, instead, to return to the six-party talks," she said in a statement.

The six-party talks, suspended by North Korea, involved negotiations by the United States, China, South Korea, Japan and Russia with Pyongyang over the country's nuclear program.

The North's warning effectively stepped up its customary anti-U.S. vitriol, in which it often accuses Washington of plotting an attack. The North has recently come under heightened scrutiny after reports by the United States and Japan that it has taken steps to prepare for a test of a long-range missile.

The North's Korean Central News Agency, citing an unidentified "analyst" with the state-run Rodong Sinmun newspaper, accused the United States of harassing Pyongyang with war exercises, a massive arms buildup and increased aerial espionage by basing new spy planes in South Korea.

"This is a grave military provocation and blackmail to the DPRK, being an indication that the U.S. is rapidly pushing ahead in various fields with the extremely dangerous war moves," the dispatch said.

"The army and people of the DPRK are now in full preparedness to answer a pre-emptive attack with a relentless annihilating strike and a nuclear war with a mighty nuclear deterrent," the report said.

DPRK stands for the North's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

The report concluded by urging the U.S. to "get out of South Korea promptly." About 29,500 U.S. troops are stationed in South Korea as a deterrent against the communist North.

On Friday, Pyongyang accused the United States of driving the situation on the Korean Peninsula "to the brink of war," and said it is fully prepared to counter any U.S. aggression.

Washington and Japan have said in recent weeks that spy satellite images show North Korea has taken steps to prepare a long-range Taepodong-2 missile for a test-launch.

Estimates for the range of the missile vary widely, but at least one U.S. study said it could be able to reach parts of the United States with a light payload.

Speculation that Pyongyang could fire the missile has waned in recent days, however, since the country's top ally and a major source of its energy supplies, China, publicly suggested North Korea should not to go ahead with the test.

A news report said Monday that China has offered a new proposal over the stalled six-party talks.

Chinese State Councilor Tang Jiaxuan told Ichiro Ozawa, the head of Japan's main opposition party, that China had relayed the proposal to Japan, the two Koreas, the United States and Russia, Kyodo News agency reported, citing party officials.

The report did not elaborate on the proposal. An opposition party spokesman in Tokyo could not be reached for comment. Ozawa is in Beijing for a six-day stay that party officials hope will include a meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao, according to Kyodo.

The United States and its allies South Korea and Japan have taken quick steps over the past week to strengthen their missile defenses. Washington and Tokyo are working on a joint missile-defense shield, and South Korea is considering the purchase of American SM-2 defensive missiles for its destroyers.

The U.S. and North Korea have been in a standoff over Pyongyang's nuclear weapons program since 2002. The North claims to have produced nuclear weapons, but that claim has not been publicly verified by outside analysts.

While public information on North Korea's military capabilities is murky, experts doubt that the regime has managed to develop a nuclear warhead small enough to mount on its long-range missiles.

Nonetheless, Lt. Gen. Michael Maples, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told U.S. lawmakers last week that officials took the potential launch reports seriously and were looking at the full range of capabilities possessed by North Korea.


.

"shazbat"
07-05-2006, 08:42 AM
Seems to me I recall an old Peter Sellers movie. "The Mouse that Roared"

Teiwaz
07-05-2006, 05:55 PM
I just can't take them seriously. I know I should, I think Darwin is within range, but I think Seller's movie title is apt. All that trash they're talking reminds me of a little weedy punk telling some 6'4" blackbelt how he is gonna open a can of whup arse on him. Or a little terrier yapping at a Rottweiler it thinks is on a leash. Peoples Democratic Republic my arse.

nelson
07-05-2006, 10:26 PM
I tend to agree with both of you.

So what is more laughable, the threat of N. Korea taking on the world, or a 'disciplinary' action from the UN?

Japan Drafts UN Resolution Condeming North Korea's Missle Testing
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,202094,00.html


The UN disciplinary response:

Offense #1: We'll warn you!

Offense #2: We'll warn you again!

Offense #3: We'll warn you again!

Offense #4: We'll send you a mean letter!

Offense #5: We'll threaten to take away your right to sit at our table!

Offense #6: We'll warn you another time!

Offense #7: We'll send you another mean letter!

Offense #8: Start over from the top

The_Man
07-05-2006, 10:38 PM
The North Koreans are to be sure a strange lot, and the nutcase Kim Jong-il has the attention of the world now. What he does now is anybody’s guess but since he has a standing army of about 1,000,000 and an economy that is in shambles and a populace that is starving. One thing that I am sure of is that if he could launch a nuke at the US, I believe he would. I think he is just that desperate and unstable.

Teiwaz
07-09-2006, 10:09 PM
North Korea and South Korea will go the way of east and west Germany, or the USSR. I give it 5 years.

"shazbat"
07-10-2006, 05:32 PM
We made the mistake of giving them, or rather influencing others to give them aid the last time they started rattling their sabres some years back, to give support to the "poor innocents" that were not being fed.
Well guess what, they are still not being fed but the army is, Kim Jong Ill is, and their building and teasting missles now.
Should have nipped it in the bud then. Now we've helped him get stronger and become more of a menace.
We need to quit buying crap from China till "they" deal with what they've created.

nelson
07-11-2006, 10:57 AM
This madman wants to be significant in the eyes of the world. He wants the world stage. Everyone has been focused on the middle east, Bin Laden, Islamic terrorism, and poor Kim Jong-il must feel a little left out.

So he feels compelled to shake things up a little... by issuing threats, testing missles, and claiming nuclear weapons. Now he has the attention he wanted.

With Russia and China preventing a UN consensus (hence the weakness of the UN - nobody can ever agree on anything), Jong-il is strengthened, and may think he has powerful friends.

And we have a problem.

Which begs the question - shouldn't we be very careful about the amount of aid we give to other countries? Today we are giving massive aid to nations in Africa. Will one or more of them be our enemy tomorrow?