PDA

View Full Version : newspaper circulation down


nelson
04-27-2009, 08:02 AM
This is an amazing sign of the times. Of course more people are going online for their news, but I also think many are starting to catch on to traditional news media bias. Notice the Wall Street Journal's circulation did not drop.

New FAS-FAX Shows (More) Steep Circulation Losses
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003966601
By Jennifer Saba
Published: April 27, 2009 7:45 AM ET

NEW YORK The Audit Bureau of Circulations released this morning the spring figures for the six months ending March 31, 2009, showing that country’s largest metros continue to shed daily and Sunday circulation, now at a record rate.

According to ABC, for 395 newspapers reporting in this spring, daily circulation fell 7% to 34,439,713 copies compared to the same March period in 2008. On Sunday for 557 newspapers, circulation was down 5.3% to 42,082,707. These averages do not include 84 newspapers with circulations below 50,000 due to a change in publishing frequency.

The percent comparisons are for the same period ending in March 2008. (All daily averages are for Monday through Friday.)

Daily circulation at The New York Times dropped 3.5% to 1,039,031. Sunday circulation was down 1.7% to 1,451,233.

The Washington Post lost 1.6% of its daily circ to 665,383 and 2.3% to 868,965.

USA Today, as reported earlier this month, lost 7.4% of its daily circulation to 2,113,725 due to a decline in hotel copies.

Daily circulation at The Wall Street Journal was up a fraction 0.6% to 2,082,189, but this was certainly the exception, not the rule.

Daily circulation at The Boston Globe skidded 13.6% to 302,638 copies. Sunday decreased 11.2% to 466,665.

New York's Daily News was off 14%, but rival New York Post lost even more, at minus 20%. The Star-Ledger of Newark shed over 16%. Newsday, in comparison, lost "only" 7%.

For ranking of top 25, go to:
http://tinyurl.com/dnkmdg

Daily circulation at The Miami Herald plunged 15.8% to 202,122. Sunday declined 13.1% to 270,166.

San Francisco Chronicle shed 15.7% of daily copies to 312,118. Sunday fell 16.5% to 312,118.

Tribune Co. papers made highly-touted redesigns in this period, but lost readers. The Chicago Tribune lost 7.4% of its daily circulation to 501,202 and 4.5% on Sunday to 858,256 copies. Circulation plunged at the Los Angeles Times at 6.5% of its daily circulation (Monday through Friday) to 723,181 copies. Sunday was down 7.4% to 1,019,388.

The Philadelphia Inquirer lost 13.7% of its daily circulation to 288,298. Sunday was hit just as hard, down 12% to 550,400. Daily circulation at its sister publication the Daily News fell 7.6% to 99,103. (At the end of March the Inquirer started distributing the Daily News within its pages. The change does not affect the circulation for this period.)

Daily circulation at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution plummeted almost 20% to 261,828. Sunday decreased 7% to 462,011.

The Star Tribune in Minneapolis and the Chicago Sun-Times took very slim losses -- a kind of victory.

The Houston Chronicle was down almost 14% of daily circulation to 425,138. Sunday fell 7.8% to 583,364 copies.

The Arizona Republic in Phoenix was down 5.7% in daily circulation to 389,701 while the paper gained 0.2% on Sunday with a total of 516,562 copies.

The Plain Dealer, Cleveland lost 11.7% of its average daily circulation to 291,630. Sunday was down 8.15 to 393,352.

For ranking of top 25:
http://tinyurl.com/dnkmdg

Max
04-27-2009, 08:37 AM
Nelson since Jeannie worked for a paper I know that circulation dropping has been a trend for many papers for years. I expect the wall street journal is somewhat immune due to it's big name but many turn to online instant media now and the news paper is on it's way out IMHO.

MYCAR47562
04-27-2009, 08:42 AM
Kind Of Amazing It Has Lasted As Long As It Has If You Think About It Everything Else Has Fell Why Not The Paper

right$pecial
04-29-2009, 01:54 AM
These things happen as technology changes. You don't see us running off to the telegraph like our 1890 counterparts. I still think there is a place for newspapers but the days of growth are probably numbered.